#3196
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Anaconda
$300 per hour.
True she does have another phone not the iPhone she used to have. She gave her iPhone to her friend when she left last year. And Anaconda, unlike me you certainly have made some useless contributions. As for casting doubt. Why not go punt yourself. And yes you are half right, I did read about YOYO and YUMI. And no I have not seen them. Only read about them. Why don't you go lurk on other forums and only contribute something positive when you finally get a f**ck I will not play your stupid games anymore dickhead. You will be ignored from now on.
__________________
Peace and love to all |
#3197
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Melbourne Australia
Thank you Knackers for your words of wisdom.
The apparent lack of credibility of your story has been challenged by three separate members. All of the comments about the contradictions in your story have been polite and logical. Your responses have been increasingly shifty, antagonistic and impolite. I am happy to let the Sammyboy members make up their own minds about your personal credibility in the light of your unexplained contradictions and inconsistencies. You are definitely trying to hide something. I wonder what was your past identity before you became Knackers? |
#3198
|
|||
|
|||
Sasha @ 59 York
lol, reading this forum just never fails to excite me! Rachel and Yoyo are both GREAT fucks, and that's all that matters not sure about the new Yumi though, anyway on to the FR...
Sasha @ 59 York Never tried 59 York before in my entire Melbourne punting experience, so decided to give it a try on a Thursday afternoon, dropped in and was suprised to see my spectacle friend from 39 Tope at the counter, and he was equally suprised to see me here. Told me there were currently 4 girls available, but recommended Sasha to me. As the girls came out 1 by 1, I couldn't remember their names, 'cause my eyes were already set on Sasha who had a really sweet look and nice fair skin. Paid for 45mins and went in the room... When Sasha came in, the first thing I felt was that she's really shy, but friendly and with a smile on her face. To my suprise, she could speak relatively fluent Mandarin, apparently having studied it for 2 years in China. Told me she's 22 (which I believed, 'cause she genuinely looked 22) and only been working here for 5 days (Possible 'cause she was quite inexperienced). Showered together, dried up and lay on the bed. The rest of the session was really SOP and I was quite disappointed despite Sasha being a really friendly and nice girl. No DFK. Lack of GFE. Basically just went from average catbath to poor BBBJ (lacked suction) to average FJ (missionary followed by doggy). But I do have a feeling she will improve the more I visit her, 'cause she seemed abit shy, need to open her up more All in all, a slightly below average session. In short, if you want a slutty, hot looking root, then Sasha won't be suitable, but if you're after a nice, friendly, cute looking one, then Sasha might be suitable, though still very inexperienced in this line. Summary Sasha @ 59 York (22yo) Looks: 7.5/10 (Cute SYT look with a suiting Bob haircut) Body: 7/10 (Petite frame; really soft A cup boobs; smooth, fair skin to make up for small boobs) Catbath: 6/10 (Below average; lack of tongue action and wetness) BBBJ: 6/10 (Technique was poor, lacking suction) FJ: 6/10 (Eyes open staring at you all the time; lacked passion) GFE: 5/10 (Despite being nice and friendly, showed minimal GFE and no DFK) RTF: Maybe.. Got a feeling she'll improve the more times you visit her Last edited by humsupboy; 22-04-2011 at 05:37 PM. |
#3199
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Humsupboy
Thanks Bro, I am sure you will teach her
I was talking with Kevin few days ago and he said they have 5 new girls at 39 and at 59
__________________
Peace and love to all |
#3200
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Humsupboy
Sasha must be one of the new girls then!
|
#3201
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Melbourne Australia
Knackers, you have assured us that you plan to ignore this dickhead from now on, but I will take the opportunity to respond to the "factual" part of your last post, rather than the abusive part.
You said, "$300 per hour" in answer to my question about the hourly rate charged by No.39 for outcalls. I suspect that you pulled this figure out of the air, as the real number is $350 per hour. In answer to the post by Snapperhead, you responded, "True she does have another phone not the iPhone she used to have. She gave her iPhone to her friend when she left last year." What an fine example of trying to avoid the issue. Snapperhead's post was entirely about the fact that Rachael did not keep any customers' phone numbers from last year, not about what model phone she has. Yet you chose to completely ignore this key issue. Knackers, don't bother responding to these ramblings of a dickhead. But I am confident other members will see through your pitiful efforts to cover up your contradictions. |
#3202
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Humsupboy
The three that I know of are your Sasha, Ivy & Barbie,
They are at 59..
__________________
Peace and love to all |
#3203
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Manhattan Terrace
I was in the city last night and drove past Manhattan Terrace.
Is this place any good or should I not bother?
__________________
Peace and love to all |
#3204
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Manhattan Terrace
noob..u should stick to indian anal sex @ westside
|
#3205
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Manhattan Terrace
Quote:
i always want to go but dont seem to have the guts. |
#3206
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Melbourne Australia
I'll go.
I want to use my megacock on these wls. |
#3207
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Anaconda
Quote:
Come on....prove me and the management of Tope wrong. |
#3208
|
|||
|
|||
Re:
Go back stirring trouble on your other forum.
You are not welcome here.
__________________
Peace and love to all |
#3209
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nadia
Today I saw Nadia @ 39. A very good GFE and very good service. I have seen her a few times in the line up and today was my lucky day with her.
FYI. Papasans also told me that Coffee is now working at 59 York st for a while.
__________________
Peace and love to all |
#3210
|
|||
|
|||
Re:
Quote:
He posted strong evidence questioning your credibility about whether Rachael still had your phone number from last year. You have not responded in any factual way. Instead, you continue your evasive tactics of attacking your accusers in a futile attempt to divert attention from the facts. Try to avoid the aggressive offensive crap and debate the issue in a polite manner. If you have FACTS to back up your position, present them instead of abusing members. |
Advert Space Available |
Bookmarks |
|
|