|
Coffee Shop Talk of a non sexual Nature Visit Sam's Alfresco Heaven. Singapore's best Alfresco Coffee Experience! If you're up to your ears with all this Sex Talk and would like to take a break from it all to discuss other interesting aspects of life in Singapore, pop over and join in the fun. |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Neo Gim Huah’s Punishment Is Too Light
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
Source: States Time Review admin / 9 mins ago I am disappointed with the verdict of Neo Gim Huah, who was jailed 3 weeks for voluntarily causing hurt against 16 year old Amos Yee. This is what Neo Gim Huah said of his actions in Court today: “I remember how arrogant he was…That’s why I thought by giving him one slap would instill fear in him, and also let him know what are the ways of the world.” “Neo had said that he had intentionally hit Yee in the presence of the media as he “wanted the assault to be publicised so that the world at large would know that (Yee) was being taught a lesson” Photo from The Straits Times This is clearly not only one charge of voluntarily causing hurt. By his own admission in Court, there are two other valid charges against Neo Gim Huah: 1) An attempted criminal intimidation to make Amos Yee plead guilty 2) A subjudice contempt of court to influence Court’s judgment on an ongoing trial End of Article Clearly this piece of "chicken shit" Neo Gim Huah's slapping of Amos is pre-mediated and was jailed only for 3 weeks. It is just a slap on the wrist compare that of a man who spits at Woodlands Bus Interchange and got 5 weeks in jail and fine $800. Prosecution should appeal and ask for a heavier sentence. Otherwise Neo's sentence is making a mockery of the law. Excerpt from Yahoo News: The man at the centre of the Woodlands Bus Interchange spitting incident last year was sentenced to five weeks in jail and slapped an $800 fine, but he was wiping away grateful tears as he was led out of court handcuffed. Juraimi bin Kamaludin, 48, was on Thursday found guilty of criminal use of force, causing a public nuisance as well as for a rash act endangering life and the personal safety of others. The charge of disorderly behaviour, which was initially stood down, was taken into consideration. Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com. |
Advert Space Available |
Bookmarks |
|
|